Abstracts – Browse Results

Search or browse again.

Click on the titles below to expand the information about each abstract.
Viewing 13 results ...

Cha, H S and O’Connor, J T (2005) Optimizing Implementation of Value Management Processes for Capital Projects. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 131(02), 239–51.

Darren Graham, L, Smith, S D and Dunlop, P (2005) Lognormal Distribution Provides an Optimum Representation of the Concrete Delivery and Placement Process. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 131(02), 230–8.

Dikmen, I, Birgonul, M T and Kiziltas, S (2005) Prediction of Organizational Effectiveness in Construction Companies. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 131(02), 252–61.

Elhakeem, A and Hegazy, T (2005) Graphical Approach for Manpower Planning in Infrastructure Networks. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 131(02), 168–75.

Hinze, J, Huang, X and Terry, L (2005) The Nature of Struck-by Accidents. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 131(02), 262–8.

Kajewski, S L (2005) Multilevel Formwork Load Distribution with Posttensioned Slabs. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 131(02), 203–10.

Kazaz, A and Birgonul, M T (2005) Determination of Quality Level in Mass Housing Projects in Turkey. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 131(02), 195–202.

  • Type: Journal Article
  • Keywords: Quality control; Housing; Project management; Construction industry; Turkey;
  • ISBN/ISSN: 0733-9364
  • URL: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2005)131:2(195)
  • Abstract:
    In Turkey, achievement of acceptable levels of quality in the construction sector has long been a problem. Great expenditures of time, money, and resources are wasted each year due to inefficient or nonexistent quality levels prevailing in the industry. The situation is even worse in the case of mass housing projects addressing to low and middle income groups. It is the purpose of this paper to identify the type of deviations resulting in rework in mass housing projects, since construction firms can only increase their profit margins by paying more attention to the deviation types. More importantly, firms can improve their images in the sector and thus, can take new projects. To achieve the objective mentioned above, data have been derived from 400 cases by means of a questionnaire containing 108 questions, and results of this survey were evaluated by several statistical techniques. It is concluded that households are not completely satisfied from the quality of products and/or services delivered within their housing units. In future studies, the causes and costs of the rework should be researched for better understanding the results together with the remedial measures being implemented.

Love, P E D, Tse, R Y C and Edwards, D J (2005) Time–Cost Relationships in Australian Building Construction Projects. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 131(02), 187–94.

Ping Ho, S (2005) Bid Compensation Decision Model for Projects with Costly Bid Preparation. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 131(02), 151–9.

Schexnayder, C, Knutson, K and Fente, J (2005) Describing a Beta Probability Distribution Function for Construction Simulation. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 131(02), 221–9.

Shen, L Y and Wu, Y Z (2005) Risk Concession Model for Build/Operate/Transfer Contract Projects. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 131(02), 211–20.

Walsh, K D, Sawhney, A and Brown, A (2005) International Comparison of Cost for the Construction Sector: Purchasing Power Parity. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 131(02), 160–7.

Zheng, D X M and Ng, S T (2005) Stochastic Time–Cost Optimization Model Incorporating Fuzzy Sets Theory and Nonreplaceable Front. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 131(02), 176–86.